April 25^th, 2017-

The final week of April has brought about a massive change in growing conditions for most of North Carolina.  Much of the state experienced daily highs that approached 90° last week.  Temperatures struggled to reach the high 50’s yesterday (April 24^th) and might hit the mid-60’s today.  Temperatures should moderate later in the week as we get back into the 80’s.  At this point the temperature fluctuation is the least of our concern, as rainfall totals have surpassed seven inches in some Coastal Plain areas.

Rainfall estimates from the past 30 hours vary widely across the tobacco growing regions of our state (Table 1). Despite the wide variation, producers who have already transplanted tobacco and/or applied fertilizer (pre- or post-transplanting) should give serious consideration to fertilizer leaching adjustments.  Estimating the amount of fertilizer lost due to excessive rainfall is very difficult, so we are forced to make a few general assumptions.  What follows are some of the assumptions and considerations.

• Where rainfall has exceeded two inches, consider replacing 100% of all nitrogen that had been applied to date.

• Where rainfall is less than two inches, consider replacing NO MORE than 50% of all nitrogen that had been applied to date.  Additional adjustments can be made closer to layby if needed, but it is important to monitor crop response prior to doing so.

• For both scenarios, apply one pound of potassium for every one pound of nitrogen. Potassium is not as leachable as nitrogen and is typically applied at a 2:1 ratio; therefore, adjusting at a 1:1 ratio will bring the nutrients back to the preferred balance.

• The rainfall totals documented in Table 1 are a great example of multiple fertilizer applications are preferred over a single application. Multiple fertilizer applications, separated by time and growth stage, hedge against severe nutrient losses in the event of a severe rainfall event.

• When making a leaching adjustment, consider using fertilizer sources absent of phosphorus. Phosphorus is not very leachable in the soil profile, therefore it is likely that the nutrient is still in place.  This will reduce the cost of having to re-apply nutrients.

• Consider soil texture and depth to clay when making a decision regarding potassium fertilizer source. Applying K-Mag (22% K₂O, 11% Magnesium, and 22% Sulfur) could prove beneficial in coarse soil textures where dolomitic lime has not been applied for more than two years.  In this situation magnesium could be limiting.  Keep in mind that no more than 30 lbs of magnesium is needed for a healthy tobacco crop.  If magnesium is not believed to be limiting, then potassium sulfate (0-0-50) should suffice.  As always, potassium chloride (0-0-60) is NOT recommended even at a reduced application rate.

• Multiple nitrogen sources are acceptable for leaching adjustments. Recent research has shown that that liquid materials (UAN, 24S, and CN-9) perform as well as dry materials (calcium nitrate, calcium ammonium nitrate, and ammonium sulfate).  The single point worth considering when comparing these sources is cost.  Typically is the UAN and 24S sources that are significantly cheaper than CN-9, calcium nitrate (dry), and calcium ammonium nitrate (dry) sources.  Considering the added cost of re-applying fertilizer, material cost is likely to have a large impact on profit.

• Monitor fields closely for signs of nutrient deficiency. This is a great opportunity to use the Nutrient Diagnostic Key on the NCSU Tobacco Portal.  Collecting tissue samples for laboratory analysis is another tool that will help aid in decision making as the season progresses.  A few pictures have been included that provide an overview of nitrogen, potassium, sulfur, and magnesium deficiency (Figures 1-4).

• The leaching adjustment recommendations provided in the previous section are very specific to our current situation. Producers should be aware that the 2017 NCSU Tobacco Production Guide contains additional information for leaching adjustments (page 65).  For convenience, a table that summarizes the information found in the Production Guide is included in Figure 5.

• Foliar fertilizer applications are not recommended for leaching adjustments. It is reality that a fairly large quantity of nitrogen and potassium will be needed to correct for leaching losses.  The large quantities needed will likely produce severe injury if applied to the plant foliage.  Fertilizers applied foliar are only designed to spoon-feed small doses of select nutrients (primarily boron and manganese) and great risk is experienced when trying to feed more than 10 pounds of nitrogen and potassium.

• It is imperative that producers wait until fields are sufficiently dry before attempting to cultivate or apply fertilizer.  This might be easier said than done when trying to prevent flopping/wilting; however, working wet soil can lead to issues (such as increased soil compaction and resistance) much later in the season. Of course, all measures should be taken to remove standing water from fields.